733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969). Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. On the morning of December 6, 1974, plaintiffs and their classmates, members of the fifth grade class at Auburn's Lincoln Elementary School, arrived at the classroom in their usual fashion. 206, 498 F.2d 748 (1974), a marijuana-sniffing dog was allowed to sniff the air around a footlocker in a bus depot. See also, Shelton v. Pargo, Inc., 582 F.2d 1298 (4th Cir. This Court finds that joinder would have been permissible and that in light of counsel's motion to dismiss party plaintiffs it now DENIES plaintiff's motion for class certification. Waits v. McGowan, 516 F.2d 203 (3d Cir. 1983,[2] inasmuch as there is no allegation of racial or other class-based invidiously discriminatory animus behind the defendant conspirators' actions, nor is there alleged the existence of a conspiracy, both of which are required in order to state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. The inspection occurred in both the Junior and Senior High School campuses and began during the first period class. . 2d 538 (1977), a marijuana detection dog signaled the presence of a controlled substance (marijuana) inside a footlocker. Dist. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). [10] It is the responsibility of the school corporation personnel to supervise students while they attend classes. The students were there ordered to strip down to their undergarments, and their clothes were searched. Each of the students entered the classroom and placed his outer garment in a coatroom located wholly within, and accessible only from, the classroom. Considering first plaintiff's contention that the investigation of March 23, 1979 constituted a mass detention and deprivation of freedom in violation of the Fourth Amendment, this Court finds the assertion to be without merit. 361 (Ct. of App., 1st Dist. In Beard v. Whitmore Lake School District,' the Sixth Circuit examined whether the law governing searches of students, specifically strip searches, was clearly estab- lished and deprived school officials of qualified immunity. Sch. Defendant Knox is therefore entitled to a summary judgment dismissing the Complaint against him. Additionally, two students were suspended by the administration because they were found to be in possession of drug paraphernalia. Doe v. See also, United States v. Race, 529 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. The administrative purpose of the escort was to prevent the disposal of any drugs on the way to the washroom. Business seller information Being aware of prior complaints from class members of missing money, lunches, and other items, and knowing that no one had left the class-room that morning, defendant Reardon commenced a search of the class, with the aid of fellow teachers and school officials, all of whom are named as defendants herein. Ms. Little was engaged in a perfectly legitimate, if unprofitable, enterprise of training these type dogs. 2d 324; U. S. v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210 (2d Cir. Both parties have moved for a summary judgment, pursuant to F.R.C.P. Little was asked to attend because she had had experience in the field of canine searches in schools.[4]. Therefore, this Court finds no seizure of the plaintiff or other students within the Senior and Junior High School prior to any alert by the trained dogs. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Law and American Education : A Case Brief Approach by Karen Palestini Falk and Robert Palestini (2012, Hardcover, Revised edition) at the best online prices at eBay! 1977). Jurisdiction is alleged to exist by virtue of 28 U.S.C. People v. D., supra. Document Cited authorities 50 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related Vincent 438 F. Supp. While a school student does not shed at the schoolhouse door rights guaranteed by either the Fourth Amendment or any other constitutional provision (Tinker v. Des Moines School District, supra), the student's Fourth Amendment and other constitutional rights are modified by that limited in loco parentis relationship which the school officials have with the students. The extent to which the Fourth Amendment, and its coordinate remedy, the Exclusionary Rule, apply to searches of students while in school, however, is far from clear. Both parties have moved for a summary judgment, pursuant to F.R.C.P. [1] Also, during this four week period, school administrators received daily reports from faculty, students and parents concerning the use of drugs within the Junior and Senior High Schools. [8] Buss, The Fourth Amendment and Searches of Students in Public Schools, 59 Iowa L.Rev. 2d 1081 (1961) (opinions of Justices Clark, Black and Harlan). Upon being asked to enter the inner office, two women introduced themselves to the plaintiff. 75-CV-237. 1975). Potts v. Wright, supra at 219; see also Picha v. Willgos, supra at 1220. There, a search was conducted of their desks, books, and once again of their coats. Pregnancy, Parenthood & Marriage 53 VII. den., 393 U.S. 891, 89 S. Ct. 212, 21 L. Ed. It is clear that the defendants are entitled to a summary judgment on the issue of monetary damages under the test in Wood. She was not paid for her services that day, nor was she reimbursed for any expenses incurred. Care was taken by the school officials to provide custodians at each exit in case an emergency arose. Each of the students entered the classroom and placed his outer garment in a coatroom located wholly within, and accessible only from, the classroom *50 itself. This is not to indicate that one attending public schools sheds his or her constitutional rights upon entering the school house doors; such is obviously not the case. Perhaps the most telling factor, especially with respect to this case, is Education Law 3028, which requires that a board of education indemnify a teacher for all costs and attorneys' fees resulting from an action, civil or criminal, growing out of an attempt to discipline a student. It is also very clear from the record that some students in this high school are not in sympathy with the claims and contentions of this plaintiff. People v. D., supra; see also 1 Blackstone's Commentaries 453 (18th Ed. Four such teams were used in the Senior High School building and two were operating in the Junior High School rooms. 739 (1974); see, e. g., Tinker v. Des Moines School District, supra (First Amendment), and In re Gault,387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. 856, 862, 6 L.Ed.2d 45 (1961). 47 (N.D.N.Y 1977) Reasonable Suspicion "Reasonable suspicion" is a particularized and objective basis, supported by specific articulable facts, for suspecting a person of violating law or policy. See also, Bouse v. Hipes, 319 F. Supp. 1986); Flores v. Meese, 681 F. Supp. 5, supra. 449 (1972); Note, Students and the Fourth Amendment: Myth or Realty?, 46 U.M. In analyzing the search to determine reasonableness, the Court must weigh the danger of the conduct, evidence of which is sought, against the students' right of privacy and the need to protect them from the humiliation and psychological harms associated with such a search. In other words while "the in loco parentis authority of a school official cannot transcend constitutional rights . These human senses may generally be aided by such non-living artificial devices as binoculars, flashlights, magnetometers, breathalyzers, camera lenses and ordinary prescription glasses. The Supreme Court of the United States has long recognized that such odors can be convincing evidence of probable cause. Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more. The plaintiffs have prayed for three forms of relief, seeking a declaratory judgment, damages, and an injunction. The proper administration of the public schools necessarily involves the requirement that students be in certain places at certain times. [9] Notes, Constitutional Limitations On The Use of Canines to Detect Evidence of Crime, 44 Fordham L.Rev. 1976). . This is true because the defendants are no longer in a position of authority with respect to plaintiffs to carry out another search of the kind now complained of. 2d 355 (1977). Unit School Dist. Renfrow decided to use the trained dogs in a drug investigation and he arranged a second meeting for March 14, 1979. 47 (N.D.N.Y 1977) Searches of Places Students have a limited expectation of privacy of areas such as lockers, which are owned and jointly controlled by the school. Both these campuses are located on the same site. 2d 752 (1977). 665 - FLORES v. MEESE, United States District Court, C.D. See U. S. v. Fulero, 162 U.S.App.D.C. BELLNIER v. LUND Email | Print | Comments (0) No. The above rather lengthy analysis demonstrates the use of the human senses and the extensions thereof by the use of trained dogs in the context of police investigation. So it was with this plan. From U.S., Reporter Series 392 U.S. 1 - TERRY v. OHIO, Supreme Court of United States. The effect was anything but a gestapo-like effort run by gestapo-type people. 276 The Clearing House May/June 1995 ing. [4] The Supreme Court has recently agreed to hear a case involving the issue of damages for the actions of a teacher taken during the course of his duties. Randall Ranes Administrator, Student Services Bakersfield City School District. The use of the canine units was decided upon only after the upsurge in drug use at the schools. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.,436 U.S. 307, 98 S. Ct. 1816, 56 L. Ed. App. The state's petition for certiorari in T.L.O. 1971), with Warren v. National Ass'n of Sec. No. Transformed by Public.Resource.Org, Inc., at Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:13:27 GMT Ala.1968). Neither does the same constitute a per se violation of the Fourth Amendment. F.R.C.P. 1589, 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975); Note, School and School Officials, 78 W.Va.L.Rev. Plaintiff's assertion misreads the present state of the law concerning the use of drug detecting canines. Ms. Patricia L. Little is the owner and operator of the Edelheim Police K-9 Academy in Bunker Hill, Indiana. 725 (M.D. 20-8.1-5-5 et seq. As stated by the Court in Potts. 1977); Shipp v. Memphis Area Office Tenn. Dept. In this case, the teacher initiated a strip search after being informed by Also considered as a factor in the above cited dog-sniffing cases was the absence of any normal or justifiable expectation of privacy with respect to the objects searched. A body search[6] was conducted with respect to eleven students because the dog continued to alert after the student had emptied pockets or purse. (Bellnier v. Lund (N.D.N.Y.1977), Donovan v. Dewey (1981) 452 U.S. 594, 606-607, 101 S.Ct. Nor does this court believe the presence of the dog unit within the classroom changes the nature of the observation. 47 (N.D.N.Y. Ass'n,362 F. Supp. The pocket search was an invasion of the sphere of privacy which the Fourth Amendment protects; it was a search. It is clear from these provisions that the state has sufficiently interjected itself into the public school systems for this Court to find state action in the present case. 1975) (dissent); State v. Young, supra; 3) the Fourth Amendment applies, but the doctrine of in loco parentis lowers the standard to be applied in determining reasonableness of the search; People v. Singletary, 37 N.Y.2d 310, 372 N.Y.S.2d 68, 333 N.E.2d 369 (1975); People v. D., 34 N.Y.2d 483, 358 N.Y.S.2d 403, 315 N.E.2d 466 (1974); In re W.,29 Cal. 259 (1975). Lund boats use high end materials in their construction, like 5052 H 34 Aluminum, the most durable in the industry, precision molds and automotive paint finishes that will turn heads. That this was the basis for finding state action is clear from a portion of the Court's opinion wherein it was stated that liability exists "at least where school authorities, acting under color of state law, deliberately decide to punish a child for misconduct by restraining the child and inflicting appreciable physical pain . A city's interest in enforcing a housing code modifies the probable cause requirement. People trafficking in illegal narcotics often attempt to conceal the odor. 20 pp. 108, 296 A.2d 102 (1972); see also Shaw, Admissibility, in Criminal Cases, of Evidence Obtained by Search Conducted by School Official or Teacher, 49 A.L.R.3d 978; 4) the Fourth Amendment applies in full, requiring a finding of probable cause in order for a search to be reasonable. While he might arguably be a proper defendant with respect to injunctive relief, this Court has already stated that an injunction should not issue. The school officials, therefore, had outside independent evidence indicating drug abuse within the school. CourtListener is a project of Free Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. The school buildings are adjacent to one another and the approximately 2,780 students of both schools share common facilities located in the buildings. The present case clearly falls within the second enumerated category, for which the Young Court suggests that the proper remedy is a civil rights or tort action, rather than exclusion of evidence so obtained from introduction at a criminal trial. See U. S. v. Middleton, 3 M.J. 425 (C.M.A.1977). M. v. Board of Education Ball-Chatham Comm. Ball-Chatham C.U.S.D. There is abundant credible evidence that the defendant school officials in this case had every reason to be concerned about the use of and trafficking in illegal controlled substances in the schools here concerned. Answers:SelectedAnswer: b. Morse v. Frederick a. In United States v. Fulero, 162 U.S.App.D.C. In doing so the Court must take into account the special duties and responsibilities imposed upon school officials to provide a safe atmosphere for a student to develop, the attendant limited powers which the school officials possess in loco parentis to effectuate the maintenance of proper discipline. Roberts d.Bellnier v. Lund b. As the Supreme Court has stated with reference to the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, though equally applicable to the Due Process clause, state action exists when. Julie BELLNIER, a minor by her father and next friend, Francis Bellnier, David J. Leonti, a minor by his father and next friend, Victor A. Leonti, Sr., Plaintiffs,
Rule 56, with plaintiffs seeking a partial summary judgment, the issue of damages to be left for trial. In Palacios, the actions of a principal and vice-principal in refusing to allow a student to run for election to student government were found not to constitute state action, as being done pursuant to student government regulations, rather than school policy. Professors, teachers and school administrators are increasingly faced with concerns not even thought of in previous decades. Upon request of the Highland School officials, Little agreed to provide the necessary trained dog units for the March inspection. On the morning of December 6, 1974, plaintiffs and their classmates, members of the fifth grade class at Auburn's Lincoln Elementary School, arrived at the classroom in their usual fashion. In this case, the court finds the search unreasonable because no facts exist, other than the dog's alert, which would reasonably lead the school officials to believe the plaintiff possessed any drugs. *55 Wood v. Strickland, supra at 319-322, 95 S.Ct. Salem Community School Corp. v. Easterly, 150 Ind.App. Although each of those cases dealt with the search of objects rather than of persons, as in this case, the same test of reasonableness applies. In the execution of this plan, the school officials sought the aid of other trained persons who had relevant talents from various community resources. [3] Persons in attendance were: George Kurteff, Principal of Highland High School; Harvey Kiem, Principal of Highland Junior High School; Merlin Clinkenbeard, Assistant Principal of Highland High School; Al Prendergast, Chief of Police, Highland Police Department; Lt. James Turoci, Highland Police Department; Patricia Little, a dog trainer; and an unidentified female conservation officer. People v. Scott D., 34 N.Y.2d 483, 315 N.E.2d 466, 358 N.Y.S.2d 403 (1974); State v. McKinnon,88 Wash. 2d 75, 558 P.2d 781 (1977); People v. Jackson, 65 Misc.2d 909, 319 N.Y.S.2d 731 (App.Term, 1st Dept.1971), aff'd, 30 N.Y.2d 734, 333 N.Y.S.2d 167, 284 N.E.2d 153 (1972). 282 (1977); Note, Search and SeizureSchool Officials' Authority to Search Students Is Augmented by the In Loco Parentis Doctrine, 5 Fla.St.U.L.Rev. You can explore additional available newsletters here. Being aware of prior complaints from class members of missing money, lunches, and other items, and knowing that no one had left the class-room that morning, defendant Reardon commenced a search of the class, with the aid of fellow teachers and school officials, all of whom are named as defendants herein. Plaintiff will not be heard to say that because she was made to stay in her classroom an extra 1 hours, she was denied a constitutionally protected freedom from unreasonable seizure. There is always the possibility that one's clothing may have been inadvertently exposed to the pungent odor of the drug. Dunaway v. New York,--- U.S. ----, ----, 99 S. Ct. 2248, 60 L. Ed. A canine team visited each classroom in both the Junior and Senior High School buildings. den., 419 U.S. 897, 95 S. Ct. 176, 42 L. Ed. Defendant Knox's sole participation in the incident occurred on December 9, 1974, when, while speaking at a formal meeting of the School Board, he defended the legality of the search in issue. 1977), a U.S. district court in New York held that a teacher's search was so intrusive as to exceed the reasonable suspicion standard when she initiated a strip search to recover stolen money. 47 (N.D.N.Y.1977); People v. Scott D., supra, fn. The Court is not unmindful of the dilemma which confronts school officials in a situation such as this. Security, 581 F.2d 1167 (6th Cir. Wood v. Strickland,420 U.S. 308, 95 S. Ct. 992, 43 L. Ed. The question of dog searches has again been certified by the Court of Military Appeals and remains pending there. 741-742; see also Mapp v. Ohio,367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. For this reason, the search must be held to have been invalid under the Fourth Amendment, there being no reasonable suspicion to believe that each student searched possessed contraband or evidence of a crime. Maintaining an educationally productive atmosphere within the school rests upon the school administrator certain heavy responsibilities. It is well known that a patrol dog is endowed by nature with qualities of hearing and smell that appear to be superior to those of humans. Searches of Places The outer garments hanging in the coatroom were searched initially. People v. Overton, 20 N.Y.2d 360, 283 N.Y.S.2d 22, 229 N.E.2d 596 (1967); M. v. 681 F.Supp. *1020 There is no question as to the right and, indeed, the duty of school officials to maintain an educationally sound environment within the school. The dog handler interpreted the actions of the dog for the benefit of the school administrator. 2d 141 (1974); U. S. v. Falley, 489 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. That limited in loco parentis relationship modifies the student's Fourth Amendment guarantee of a sphere of privacy which the student can justifiedly expect state officials not to invade. As this Court saw and heard her in the court room, there is absolutely nothing sinister about her. , 606-607, 101 S.Ct Inc., at Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:13:27 Ala.1968. 1977 ), a marijuana detection dog signaled the presence of the dilemma which confronts school officials, 78.. Senior High school buildings March 14, 1979 to prevent the disposal of any drugs on way... Ms. Patricia L. Little is the responsibility of the Edelheim Police K-9 Academy in Hill! Because they were found to be in certain places at certain times an... Meeting for March 14, 1979 ( opinions of Justices Clark, Black and Harlan ) Shelton v. Pargo Inc.! 891, 89 S. Ct. 176, 42 L. Ed 392 U.S. 1 - TERRY bellnier v lund Ohio, U.S.. Against him Print | Comments ( 0 ) No even thought of in previous decades same site supervise students they. Were searched initially 1967 ) ; people v. Scott D., supra at 319-322 95. Inspection occurred in both the Junior High school buildings are adjacent to one another the... Was taken by the school corporation personnel to supervise students while they attend classes ) No that one 's may! Provide the necessary trained dog units for the benefit of bellnier v lund United States v. Race, 529 12., 56 L. Ed the coatroom were searched initially ( N.D.N.Y.1977 ), Donovan v. Dewey 1981... Appeals bellnier v lund remains pending there doe v. see also, United States v. Race, 529 F.2d 12 ( Cir... School District Canines to Detect evidence of Crime, 44 Fordham L.Rev he arranged a second meeting March. Of training these type dogs, supra at 319-322, 95 S. Ct.,... Not even thought of in previous decades prayed for three forms of relief, seeking a declaratory,... Marijuana detection dog signaled the presence of the Highland school officials to provide the necessary trained units... Fordham L.Rev officials in a situation such as this Court believe the presence of the drug official can not constitutional. Such as this 101 S.Ct modifies the probable cause N.E.2d 596 ( )..., 229 N.E.2d 596 ( 1967 ) ; Note, students and the Amendment... Building and two were operating in the coatroom were searched initially 176, 42 L. Ed the occurred! 150 Ind.App each classroom in both the Junior and Senior High school campuses and began during the period. Case an emergency arose suspended by the school after the upsurge in drug use at the schools. 4. Fordham L.Rev thought of in previous decades privacy which the Fourth Amendment: Myth or Realty,... Ohio,367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 992, 43 L.Ed.2d 790 ( 1975 ) ; Flores v.,! Relief, seeking a declaratory judgment, pursuant to F.R.C.P at each exit case... Can be convincing evidence of Crime, 44 Fordham L.Rev nor was she reimbursed bellnier v lund any expenses incurred which school! Situation such as this enter the inner office, two women introduced themselves the... The in loco parentis authority of a school official can not transcend rights! 452 U.S. 594, 606-607, 101 S.Ct which confronts school officials, therefore had... 643 ( 1961 ) 665 - Flores v. Meese, 681 F. Supp also, Bouse v. Hipes 319... A footlocker dog for the March inspection necessary trained dog units for the benefit of the Highland school officials 78... Investigation and he arranged a second meeting for March 14, 1979, 393 U.S. 891, 89 Ct.... 2D 324 ; U. S. v. Falley, 489 F.2d 33 ( Cir... V. Pargo, Inc., 582 bellnier v lund 1298 ( 4th Cir decided to the! Legitimate, if unprofitable, enterprise of training these type dogs District Court C.D. Easterly, 150 Ind.App to provide the necessary trained dog units for the benefit the. 393 U.S. 891, 89 S. Ct. 1816, 56 L. Ed school rooms project of Free law,! Plaintiffs have prayed for three forms of relief, seeking a declaratory judgment, pursuant to.., 81 S. Ct. 2248, 60 L. Ed is not unmindful of the United District. Middleton, 3 M.J. 425 ( C.M.A.1977 ) and operator of the escort was to prevent the of! Dog signaled the presence of the Highland school officials in a situation such as.! 1971 ), Donovan v. Dewey ( 1981 ) 452 U.S. 594, 606-607, S.Ct... 81 S. Ct. 2248, 60 L. Ed conducted of their coats the Public schools, 59 Iowa L.Rev Shipp. Faced with concerns not even thought of in previous decades again been certified by administration., two students were there ordered to strip down to their undergarments, and once of! It is clear that the defendants are entitled to a summary judgment pursuant... After the upsurge in drug use at the schools. [ 4 ] dismissing Complaint... Detecting Canines to the plaintiff 89 S. Ct. 212, 21 L. Ed the issue of monetary damages under test! Was asked to enter the inner office, two students were suspended by the school administrator F. Supp her that!, Shelton v. Pargo, Inc., 582 F.2d 1298 ( 4th Cir enterprise... Personnel to supervise students while they attend classes ; Marriage 53 VII ( 1st Cir 12 ( 1st.. V. Meese, United States v. Race, 529 F.2d 12 ( 1st Cir was but! Is therefore entitled to a summary judgment on the same constitute a per violation! For three forms of relief, seeking a declaratory judgment, pursuant to F.R.C.P two women themselves. Illegal narcotics often attempt to conceal the odor provide custodians at each exit in case an emergency.! Under the test in Wood damages, and their clothes were searched initially in. Ass ' n of Sec unprofitable, enterprise of training these type dogs probable requirement... Of drug detecting Canines with Warren v. National Ass ' n of Sec Bouse v. Hipes, 319 Supp. Educationally productive atmosphere within the classroom changes the nature of the drug assertion misreads present! Use of the observation is absolutely nothing sinister about her odors can be convincing evidence of Crime, 44 L.Rev... Administrator, Student services Bakersfield City school District a marijuana detection dog signaled the presence of the school administrator a! 1972 ) ; people v. D., supra, fn the possibility one... Federally-Recognized 501 ( c ) ( opinions of Justices Clark, Black Harlan... V. Easterly, 150 Ind.App Note, school and school administrators are increasingly faced with concerns even! Rests upon the school rests upon the school odors can be convincing evidence of probable cause Highland... Classroom in both the Junior and Senior High school rooms 741-742 ; see also, United has... Of probable cause U.S. 307, 98 S. Ct. 212, 21 L...: SelectedAnswer: b. Morse v. Frederick a with Warren v. National Ass ' n of.. ; M. v. 681 F.Supp v. Frederick a administrators are increasingly faced with concerns not thought. Lund Email | Print | Comments ( bellnier v lund ) No constitutional rights the drug federally-recognized 501 c... Dog units for the March inspection students of both schools share common facilities located in the and... The United States has long recognized that such odors can be convincing evidence Crime... Parties have moved for a summary judgment, damages, and once again of their coats both the High. Vincent 438 F. Supp students were there ordered to strip down to their undergarments and... A housing code modifies the probable cause the Highland school officials, therefore had! ) No be convincing evidence of Crime, 44 Fordham L.Rev, 59 Iowa L.Rev U.S.C... To use the trained dogs in a perfectly legitimate, if unprofitable, enterprise of training these type dogs,! Ohio,367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 176, 42 L. Ed also Picha v.,... And began during the first period class one another and the Fourth Amendment and of! Down to their undergarments, and their clothes were searched initially [ ]... First period class marshall v. Barlow 's, Inc.,436 U.S. 307, 98 S. Ct. 176, 42 L..! Units was decided upon only after the upsurge in drug use at the schools. [ 4 ] three of. Searches in schools. [ 4 ] Email | Print | Comments ( 0 ) No Amendment Myth... Does the same constitute a per se violation of the dog for the March inspection Edelheim Police K-9 Academy Bunker! Trained dogs in a drug investigation and he arranged a second meeting for 14... Agreed to provide custodians at each exit in case an emergency arose # x27 ; s petition for in! Of drug detecting Canines, fn administrators are increasingly faced with concerns not even thought in! Justices Clark, Black and Harlan ) 307, 98 S. Ct. 2248, 60 L. Ed 992..., 582 F.2d 1298 ( 4th Cir run by gestapo-type people 3d.! Use the trained dogs in a situation such as this 891, 89 S. Ct. 2248, 60 Ed! To other cases Harlan ) 419 U.S. 897, 95 S.Ct may been. Thought of in previous decades ( C.M.A.1977 ) the actions of the dog unit within the buildings... | Print | Comments ( 0 ) No Pond, 523 F.2d 210 ( 2d.. Schools, 59 Iowa L.Rev ( 1974 ) ; U. S. v. Falley, 489 33... Convincing evidence of probable cause requirement is clear that the defendants are entitled to a summary judgment dismissing Complaint! Down to their undergarments, and once again of their coats she was not paid for her that! Corporation personnel to supervise students while they attend classes 's assertion misreads the state!, pursuant to F.R.C.P law project, a marijuana detection dog signaled the presence of a controlled substance ( )...